Sunday, June 7, 2015

Scorpionflies Like Roaches & Earwigs

BG2878 E2597 - Panorpa nuptialis - male
Male Panorpa nuptialis (Panorpidae) photographed by Gayle and Jeanell Strickland
The order Mecoptera is a small one (~600 spp.), with its most speciose family (Panorpidae) often lending their vernacular name (scorpionfly; this refers to male panorpids' aculeus*-like genital bulb) to the order as a whole. They have attracted some cladistic attention due to possibly being paraphyletic with respect to Siphonaptera (fleas) and/or Diptera (flies), the two orders with which it comprises the clade Antliophora
this being based on molecular and morphological lines of evidence (Wood & Borkent, 1989; Whiting, 2002; Simiczyjew, 2002; Beutel & Baum, 2008); although this conclusion is still open to debate (Wiegmann et al., 2009; Beutel et al., 2010; Friedrich et al., 2012).

Ventral view of female Caurinus tlagu (Boreidae: Caurininae) (Sikes & Stockbridge, 2013)
Even if we take Mecoptera to be a valid taxon, it cannot be denied that it exhibits considerable phenetic variety for an order of comparatively low specific diversity: from the Nannochoristidae, which by their aquatic elateriform larvae (Fraulob et al., 2012) are so distinctive from other mecopterans as to have resulted in arguments that they deserve their own order (Hinton, 1981); to the infraorder Raptipeda, its long-legged members distinguished by their lone and unpaired tarsal claws (Liu et al., 2014); or the flightless leaping Boreidae, constituted by two greatly divergent subfamilies (the Caurininae—see above—"arguably one of the most bizarre and cryptic ... endopterygote insects"; Beutel et al., 2008) that are nonetheless united. Nor let us ignore the extinct Aneuretopsychina, a suborder that with their suctorial mouthparts appear to have been pollinators of flowering Mesozoic flora that predated angiosperms (Labandeira, 2010).

Rare - Male Forcepfly - Merope tuber - male
Ventral view of male Merope tuber captured in New Hampshire by Jace Porter; forceps are readily visible
Within the bounds of this post, I will detail only two mecopteran families that happen to be similar in their peculiarities, forming yet another distinct morphoecological facet of that order: the Meropeidae and Eomeropidae, which may (Whiting, 2002) or may not (Penny, 1975) possess an actual phylogenetic relation. The Meropeidae are the more diverse of the two, albeit with only two extant genera: Austromerope (containing one species in Australia and another in the Brazilian mâta atlantica; Machado et al., 2013) and Merope (monotypic and precinctive to eastern North America; Byers, 1973). Meropeid males are unmistakable in their possession of scythe-like jointed terminalia: these forceps (presumably utilized in copula) have earned them the vernacular name of "earwigflies", due to a perceived likeness herein to the unsegmented cerci sported by both genders of Dermaptera (Somma & Dunford, 2007).

Earwigflies are not distinctive for this alone: what with their flattened profile, ornate wing venation, opisthognathous head, and castaneous coloration the family is utterly unlike any sympatric mecopteran. These features correlate with earwigflies' nocturnal and ground-dwelling habits—unobtrusive customs that have foiled attempts to study their biology; the fact that adults stridulate by rasping the jugum§ against thoracic serrations (Sanborne, 1982; Dunford et al., 2006) is really the only detail we have gleaned, and the larvae have never been documented (Johnson, 1995).
Notiothauma reedi (Eomeropidae), photographed in Chile by David Madison
Eomeropids share earwigflies' retiring habits (Penny, 1975) and with cursorial, bristly limbs and sclerotized forewings are even more cockroach-like in their habitus (Peña, 1968): consequently, they are likewise an enigma. A single extant species (Notiothauma reedi) has been described, restricted to southern Chile in close association with forests dominated by southern beech (Nothofagus sp.) (Willmann, 1981); studied gut contents were botanical in origin (and in life the species is demonstrably fond of oatmeal; Byers, 1965), corroborating the seemingly herbivorous function of their mouthparts (Hepburn, 1969): pig carcasses deposited for forensic studies are also on the menu (Albornoz et al., 2015). Much like the Meropeidae, larvae of N. reedi remain unknown (Rebolledo et al., 1990).

Archimylacrids (the two at left) and spiloblattinid (right); image in public domain (I hope)
The ethological parallels between this pair of aberrant taxa have (naturally) led systematists to speculate that they might comprise a clade (Tillyard, 1935; Grimaldi & Engel, 2005), together forming a sister-group (Protomecoptera) to the remainder of the order (Eumecoptera) (Hennig, 1953): this hypothesis was based principally upon commonalities in meropeid and eomeropid wing venation (Riek, 1953), and was supported by reasoning that, given their cucaracha-like appearance, "protomecopterans" veritably constituted an evolutionary link between the holometabolous Mecoptera and the hemimetabolous assemblage of roachoids ("Blattoptera") (Crampton, 1930). While this imputed link to the likes of the Archimylacridae (see above) is certainly erroneous (the Endopterygotaof which the Mecoptera are a partis most akin to the Paraneoptera; Kristensen, 1991), both families are undoubtedly ancient: earwigflies were present during the middle Jurassic in Siberia (Novokshonov, 1995) and mid-Cretaceous Burma (Grimaldi & Engel, 2013); four different eomeropid genera existed across eastern Asia and western North America in the Jurassic and Paleogene periods (Archibald et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2011). The even-more-antiquated Thaumatomeropinae is delimited to several species known from the mid-Triassic of Kyrgyzstan and was, on occasion, classified in both of the taxa under consideration here (Rasnitsyn, 1974; Willmann, 1981), but deserves family rank.

Holistic consideration of eomeropid characteristics is suggestive of that family's inclusion within the clade Pistillifera (all Mecoptera exclusive of Boreidae and Nannochoristidae), since the perceived similarities that united the protomecopteran taxa were plesiomorphies (Mickoleit, 1971; Willmann, 1981; Friedrich et al., 2012). This leaves earwigflies hanging loose: the Meropeidae may either be nested well within the Pistillifera, the sister-group to the remainder of that clade (Friedrich et al., 2012), or perhaps even the basalmost twig of their order (Penny, 1975). In all likelihood, meropeid phylogeny will remain opaque until more data is acquired—anything concerning the ever-elusive larva would be especially useful.

Well, that's over with. Now to walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Calculus...   

*Scorpions' (Scorpiones) "stinger".
†Heavily compressed, sclerotized, and lacking abdominal prolegs, as in the larvae of Elateridae (click beetles).
‡Rearward-oriented (with reference to mouthparts). 
§A basal posterior lobe of an insect forewing.

Albornoz, S.; Ortloff, A.; de la Fuente, J. C.; and Vivallo, G. (2015). Notiothauma reedi, a new species of forensic importance to the forests of southern Chile. Oral presentation. Retrieved 5/31/15 from

Archibald, S. B.; Rasnitsyn, A. P.; and Akhmetiev, M. A. (2005). Ecology and Distribution of Cenozoic Eomeropidae (Mecoptera), and a New Species of Eomerope Cockerell from the Early Eocene McAbee Locality, British Columbia, Canada. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 98(4), 503-514. Retrieved 6/6/15 from

Beutel, R. G. and Baum, E. (2008). A longstanding entomological problem finally solved? Head morphology of Nannochorista (Mecoptera, Insecta). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 46(4), 346-347. Retrieved 2/24/15 from

Beutel, R. G.; Friedrich, F.; and Whiting, M. F. (2008). Head morphology of Caurinus (Boreidae, Mecoptera) and its phylogenetic implications. Arthropod Structure & Development, 37, 418-433.

Beutel, R. G.; Zimmermann, D.; Krauß, M.; Randolf, S.; and Wipfler, B. (2010). Head morphology of Osmylus fulvicephalus (Osmylidae, Neuroptera) and its phylogenetic implications. Organism's Diversity & Evolution, 10, 311-329.

Byers, G. W. (1965). New and uncommon Neotropical Mecoptera. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 38(2), 135-144. Retrieved 5/31/15 from

Byers, G. W. (1973). Zoogeography of the Meropeidae (Mecoptera). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 46(4), 511-516. 

Crampton, G. C. (1930). The wings of the remarkable archaic mecopteran Notiothauma reedi McLachlan with remarks on their Protoblattoid affinities. Psyche, 37(1), 83-103.

Dunford, J. C.; Serrano, D.; and Somma, L. A. (2006). Earwigflies in the Great Smokies. Southeast Biology, 53(1), 27-29. Retrieved 5/31/15 from

Fraulob, M.; Wipfler, B.; Hünefeld, F.; Pohl, H.; and Beutel, R. G. (2012). The larval abdomen of the enigmatic Nannochoristidae (Mecoptera, Insecta). Arthropod Structure & Development, 41(2), 187-198. Retrieved 2/24/15 from  

Friedrich, F.; Pohl, H.; Beckmann, F.; Beutel, R. G. (2012). The head of Merope tuber (Meropeidae) and the phylogeny of Mecoptera (Hexapoda). Arthropod Structure & Development, 42(1), 69-88. Retrieved 2/24/15 from 

Grimaldi, D. and Engel, M. S. (2005). Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  

Grimaldi, D. A. and Engel, M. S. (2013). The relict scorpionfly family Meropeidae (Mecoptera) in Cretaceous amber. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 86, 253-263. Retrieved 6/6/15 from

Hepburn, H. R. (1969). The proventriculus of Mecoptera. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society, 4, 159-167.

Hinton, H. E. (1981). Biology of Insect Eggs. New York: Pergamon Press.

Johnson, N. F. (1995). Variation in male genitalia of Merope tuber Newman (Mecoptera: Meropeidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 68(2), 224-233. 

Kristensen, N. P. (1991). Phylogeny of extant hexapods. In Naumann, I. D.; Cornell, P. B. C.; Lawrence, J. F.; Neilson, E. S.; Spradberry, J. P.; Taylor, R. W.; Whitten, M. J.; and Littlejohn, M. J. (eds.): The Insects of Australia: a Textbook for Students and Research Workers (2nd ed.) (pp. 125-140). CSIRO, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Liu, S.; Shih, C. K.; and Ren, D. (2014). Four new species of hangingflies (Insecta, Mecoptera, Bittacidae) from the Middle Jurassic of northeastern China. ZooKeys, 466, 77-94. Retrieved 2/24/15 from

Machado, R. J. P.; Kawada, R.; and Rafael, A. J. (2013). New continental record and new species of Austromerope (Mecoptera, Meropeidae) from Brazil. ZooKeys, 269, 51-65. Retrieved 5/30/14 from

Mickoleit, G. (1971). Zur phylogenetischen und funktionellen Bedeutung der sogenannten Notalorgane der Mecoptera (Insecta: Mecoptera). Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere, 83, 483-496.

Novokshonov, V. (1995). Der älteste Vertreter der Meropeidae (Mecoptera, Insecta). Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 69, 149-152.

Peña, L. E. (1968). Natural history notes on Notiothauma. Discovery, 4, 42-44. 

Penny, N. D. (1975). Evolution of the extant Mecoptera. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 48(3), 331-350.

Rasnitsyn, A. P. (1974). Taxonomic names, in New Mesozoic and Cenozoic Protomecoptera. Paleontological Journal, 8, 493-507.

Rebolledo, R. R.; Alda, L. L.; Gutiérrez, M. S.; and Guiñez, B. S. (1990). Antecedentes biológicos de Notiothauma reedi MacLachlan (Mecoptera: Eomeropidae) en el Monumento Natural Cerro Ñielol (Temuco, Chile). Revista Chilena de Entomología, 18, 25-28. 

Riek, E. F. (1953). Fossil mecopteroid insects from the Upper Permian of New South Wales. Records of the Australian Museum, 23, 55-87.

Sanborne, P. M. (1982). Stridulation in Merope tuber (Mecoptera: Meropeidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 114(3), 177-180.  

Sikes, D. S. and Stockbridge, J. (2013). Description of Caurinus tlagu, new species, from Prince of Wales Island, Alaska (Mecoptera, Boreidae, Caurininae). ZooKeys, 316, 35-53. Retrieved 2/24/15 from

Simiczyjew, B. (2002). Structure of the ovary in Nannochorista neotropica Navás (Insecta: Mecoptera: Nannochoristidae) with remarks on mecopteran phylogeny. Acta Zoologica, 83, 61-66.

Somma, L. A. and Dunford, J. C. (2007). Etymology of the earwigfly, Merope tuber Newman (Mecoptera: Meropeidae): simply dull or just inscrutable? Insecta Mundi, 13, 1-5.

Tillyard, R. J. (1935). The evolution of the scorpion-flies and their derivatives (Order Mecoptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 28, 1-45.

Whiting, M. F. (2002). Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera. Zoologica Scripta, 31(1), 93-104. Retrieved 2/24/15 from

Wiegmann, B. M.; Trautwein, M. D.; Kim, J.-W.; Cassel, B. K.; Bertone, M. A.; Winterton, S. L.; and Yeates, D. K. (2009). Single-copy nuclear genes resolve the phylogeny of the holometabolous insects. BMC Biology, 7, 34. Retrieved 2/24/15 from    

Willmann, R. (1981). Phylogenie und Verbreitungsgeschichte der Eomeropidae (Insecta: Mecoptera). Ein Beispiel für die Anwendung der phylogenetischen Systematik in der Paläontogie. Paläont. Z., 55, 31-49. 

Wood, D. M. and Borkent, A. (1989). Phylogeny and classification of the Nematocera. In McAlpine, J. F. and Wood, D. M. (eds.): Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol. 3 (pp. 1,333-1,370). Ottawa: Agriculture Canada.

Zhang, J.; Shih, C.; Petrulevičius, J. F.; and Ren, D. (2011). A new fossil eomeropid (Insecta, Mecoptera) from the Jiulongshan Formation, Inner Mongolia, China [electronic version]. Zoosystema, 33(4), 443-450. Retrieved 6/6/15 from